Events
When a Car Insurance company leaves a bad taste in your mouth
Tuesday 3 March 2009
It is a tad unfortunate that in the past couple of weeks I've had to experience the way in which one of the players in the car insurance industry treats its customers. I haven't lost a single demerit point since well into last century and consider myself a pretty safe driver. So a couple of weeks ago I was stationary behind a car at a pedestrian crossing when a car hit me from behind and forced me into the car in front. It's just a car and no one was hurt (just a tad shaken) so that's the main thing. All drivers calmly exchanged details, there was no shouting or yelling, all very civil really. It's just a pity that the insurance companies haven't treated their customers with the same level of respect...
I'm self employed. I earn an income by going around to see clients and helping them answer some of their pressing and emerging issues, understanding what their needs are and researching the world to come up with ideas and initiatives that can help them, or putting them in contact with others who are better placed to help them. When I need my car, I need my car. I ride to work some days, catch the train and tram on others and when I need to get from place to place at the desire of a client or potential clients, the car is often the only flexible option available to me.
It turns out that the person who ran into the back of me also uses the same Insurance company as I do so you'd think things would have gone pretty smoothly.
You'd be wrong. To say that I have been bounced around and treated with contempt would be an understatement. It all started well enough. The person who answered my initial query arranged for the tow truck to pick the car up and said I'd have a specific case manager assigned to the repair. The car went to the Insurance company's premises for assessment but they decided it was a job too complex for them so sent it off to one of the specialist repairers nearby. I never heard from the so called case-manager but did speak to the case manager of the person who ran into my car and told them I needed a hire car.
They said I needed to provide a couple of quotes and 'apply' to get approval. Mind you, their client was at fault and I was without a car so I asked why I needed to do that especially as their client had already admitted liability? I also was told that I needed to tell them precisely how long I needed the hire car for and they seemed a bit taken back when I said that I wasn't the expert and had no idea how long the car was off the road for.
I was advised to ring the repairer direct to get some more information, which I did and was told the car would take 10 days. I rang my insurer back. I was then told that I couldn't get approval until the other driver (their client) had paid their excess. I asked them 'what has you client's commitments got to do with my loss of my car - why can't you approve it?' And was told that this is just what has to happen. So I asked - when will I know when your client has paid their excess? and of course, their case manager didn't know.
The end result is that two potential client visits have been missed because my insurance company thinks the best way to treat people is to get them to jump through hoops. My car went from the Insurer to a specialist repair shop. I rang about 6 days later to see how it was coming along and told that they'd gotten too busy to do it and had sent it to another of their shops in the outer south east. So I was advised to ring them direct, which I did and was told that the car would be ready by Tuesday next week (today). So I ring today to see what time the car would be delivered back to me and have been told that the car is now going off to a dealership to get something else done to it and maybe it would be ready tomorrow. Maybe.
And on not ONE occasion has my so called 'case manager' made contact with me. I asked again about a hire car and this time the driver at fault's case manager told me in essence 'bad luck - you have to tell us how long you want the hire car for and we'll consider whether or not we'll approve it just like we told you a week or so ago'. When I again expressed my concern with the fact that I can't provide them with information on length of time given that the car is being bounced around from shop to shop, I was told that I'd just have to provide them with what I know and if it wasn't long enough I'd have to reapply.
In other words, get bounced around all over again. I have no doubt this is a deliberate and orchestrated process they use to try and avoid paying for hire car costs when their drivers are at fault.
And given that one of the recent posted Events on this website discussed the soon to be completed book 'Recession Proof Marketing - how to survive and thrive in a recession' you can rest assured that 'treating customers with contempt' is NOT one of the key ways to maximise your chances of keeping customers during an economic downturn.
Still it does give me another story of inadequate and disgraceful 'marketing' I could add to the book. I'd rather they just get it fixed properly as promised. I do hope but sense, that this will not be the last of the story with this repair
Keep informed - Sign up
Events
Friday 16 July 2010
A series of recent activities has me writing on the idea of 'future strategy' and how different organisations are approaching their future development. What is interesting is the strong sense that preparing for your potential future requires multiple paths forward, not a single 'home run'. To that end I've recently considered sporting bodies and local community driven programs which has triggered these 'thought bubbles'
Read more...
Monday 5 July 2010
Stephen Downes is one the handful of bloggers I follow consistently. I do so because Downes (unlike many others unfortunately) like to write about his thinking AS WELL AS promoting the thinking of others, whether or not he agrees with them. In that way you get a solid collection of alternative views within his field of endeavour (learning & teaching et al). The link below will take you to a presentation by David Harvey that walks you through an interesting interpretation of the Capitalist model and where we are at in the world affairs. Whether or not you agree with the content, it is highly recommended
Read more...
Monday 28 June 2010
Coming off what has been undoubtedly my busiest period (3 months) in the past decade, I'm in the throws of catching up on some light reading. I usually have at least two books on the go and my preference is for the books to be about diverse topics because it allows the mind to seek out random connections. I once 'solved' the nuclear fusion problem whilst reading books by Umberto Eco and John D Barrow. A physicist friend of mine suggested my idea was radical and yet theoretically possible. But I digress. Right now I have a wide combination - 'From Poverty to Peace' by Duncan Green looks at ways in which we can empower people to help themselves more effectively, whilst looking at the myriad of mistakes so commonly made in the area of 'aid'. 'New knowledge in Human Values' is an older book edited by Ambraham Maslow with a wide contribution of thoughts from the likes of Pitirim Sorokin, Dorothy Lee and Paul Tillich (among others) and is a walk through some of the thinking about Human Values emerging in the late 1950's. The chapters are appropriately dense undertakings and I'm finding it hard to stick with, especially as I'm more inclined to lean towards the model of Clare W Graves and his Value Systems Thoery; 'Coercion as Cure' by Thomas Szasz is a ripper of a book thus far, though I'm only a few chapters in, I can tell the quality of a book by how much 'tagging' I do within a text
Read more...
